![]()
Cornelius J. McIver
Honorable Mike Waugh
February 14, 1999
Dear Senator Waugh:
Please find enclosed the latest installment of correspondence between myself and
the commonwealth regarding the social security requirement for a driver's license.
I have also enclosed a letter I sent to my auto insurance company. It seems they
intend to not renew my auto insurance because I have no driver's license.
As your constituent, I would like to know which of the following you would
endorse/support regarding this matter:
2) Would you support legislation that would create a clear provision allowing
those without social security numbers to obtain licenses without requiring them
to produce a non-existent federal waiver?
3) Would you support legislation requiring any applicant for a driver's license to
first obtain a federal social security number, and which clearly prohibits people
like me from driving?
4) Would you support keeping the current language of 75 Pa.C.S 1510(a) and (f) so
as to preserve the ambiguity the commonwealth relies on to deprive me of equal
protection under the law?
Please let me know your position in this matter.
Thank you,
Sincerely,
[signed]
___________________________
Encl: copy, letter from PennDOT, January 8, 1999
![]()
All information presented here is done so under the protection of the First, Fourth, Ninth, and Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and article I section 2 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Furthermore, as established in the famous trial of William Penn in August 1670, and contrary to the unlawful instructions given by most American judges, in addition to judging the facts of a case, juries also have the right and duty to pass judgement on the law (meaning they may acquit a violator of the law if they believe the law in question is unconstitutional, immoral, just plain stupid, or if the penalty is deemed too harsh). Juries are also lawfully free to vote according to their conscience, above all other considerations. |