SSA Letter: Pennsylvania Waiver Provision: To be, or not to be?
This letter is posted here and has been used in my fight here in PA
with the permission of the addressee. Out of respect for this person's
privacy, I have omitted this person's name and address below, and on
my correspondence.
The Pennsylvania law that this letter refers to is here.
Note the date of this letter.
[Letterhead]
Department of Health & Human Services Social Security Administration
Refer to: Baltimore MD 21235
SEP73 February 28, 1995
[Name]
[address]
[city, State, Zip]
Dear [Name],
This is in response to your letter to the President
concerning the State of Pennsylvania's use of Social Security
numbers (SSNs) on drivers licenses.
We contacted the State of Pennsylvania and learned that the
legislation you cited was passed last year without consulting
the Social Security Administration. Since they were aware
that the Amish are exempt from Social Security coverage, they
assumed that other individuals would be also.
It was not until after the legislation was enacted that they
learned that there is no waiver permitting individuals not to
have SSNs. However, there are no present efforts underway to
amend the wording of the law.
Enclosed is a fact sheet detailing all circumstances under
which a person is required to provide a SSN and the law which
created that requirement.
If you have additional questions, you may contact any Social
Security office.
Sincerely,
[signed]
Vincent Sanudo, Director
Office of Public Inquiries
Enclosure
...looks like it's not to be...
Return to Life without Numbers
This Web Page:
http://www.cjmciver.org/sapf/ssawaiver.shtml
All information presented here is done so under the protection of the First,
Fourth, Ninth, and Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and
article I section 2 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Furthermore, as established in the famous trial of William Penn in August 1670,
and contrary to the unlawful instructions given by most American judges, in
addition to judging the facts of a case, juries also have the right and duty to
pass judgement on the law (meaning they may acquit a violator of the law if they
believe the law in question is unconstitutional, immoral, just plain stupid, or
if the penalty is deemed too harsh). Juries are also lawfully free to vote
according to their conscience, above all other considerations.
|