Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration
Important: Please read my
standard legal disclaimer. The below letter and affidavit
are, as of this writing, untested in the legal arena. I will
post any fallout, positive or negative, that this instrument
generates, if any.
Cornelius J. McIver
Anne S. Ferro, Administrator
October 19, 1999
CERTIFIED MAIL No. Z 463 686 655
Dear Ms. Ferro,
Please be so kind as to forward the enclosed asservation to the
appropriate governmental office(s) so that proper notice can be
taken of its content and appropriate action can be taken in response.
If I do not hear from you, or any of your delegates, within
thirty (30) days of your receipt of this letter, I will presume
that you do not contest any of the statements or have any rebuttal,
but stand in complete agreement with all statements contained therein.
Please also find enclosed two (2) Maryland MVA-issued cards, both
numbered M-[XXX-XXX-XXX-XXX], one of which is a Learner's Permit
issued on 12-11-81, and expiring on 3-11-82, and the other a license
card issued 11/05/93 and expiring on 11/07/98.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
[signed]
Encl: Affidavit of Termination of Driver License, dated October 13, 1999
Cc: Copy retained
I, Cornelius J. McIver, of [my address], by my signature affixed to
this document, do hereby make the following statement of fact and affirm:
I now affix my signature to these affirmations:
[notary signed]
The foregoing was subscribed and sworn to before me,
a Notary Public, of the State of Maryland, County of
Carroll, this 13th day of October , 1999.
My Commission Expires On: [expiration date]
[signed]
All information presented here is done so under the protection of the First, Fourth, Ninth, and Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and article I section 2 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Furthermore, as established in the famous trial of William Penn in August 1670, and contrary to the unlawful instructions given by most American judges, in addition to judging the facts of a case, juries also have the right and duty to pass judgement on the law (meaning they may acquit a violator of the law if they believe the law in question is unconstitutional, immoral, just plain stupid, or if the penalty is deemed too harsh). Juries are also lawfully free to vote according to their conscience, above all other considerations. |