My original affidavit was composed specifically for me by the Save-A-Patriot
Fellowship, which they do only for their members. I've not reproduced
it on this site only because it's not my work, and I don't want to
compromise the reasons SAPF only creates them for it's members.
I will say that the SAPF affidavit, though it covers social security,
is primarily geared toward income tax matters.
What is an "affidavit" anyway?
Note: Please read my disclaimer
One other disclaimer: I have no idea what might happen if one ditches
his/her SSN and thereafter attempts to file a tax return. I do believe
based on past correspondence that the IRS will not be able to process
the return, but I'll leave that adventure for someone else to experience.
2. That the Federal government, and particularly the Social Security
Administration, does not openly advertise the fact that application for a
social security account number is voluntary for citizens of the 50 union
states of the United States of America;
3. That due to fact #2 above, the mindset of the business community is
erroneously predisposed to believing that it is illegal to hire or do
business with people without social security account numbers;
4. That because of the facts #1, #2 and #3 above, I was fraudulently and
incorrectly led to believe that I was required by law to apply for a social
security account number;
5. That I was of minor age, younger than the legal and lawful age of
consent when I completed an application for a social security account
number and as a matter of law I am not bound by any act that I committed
when younger than the lawful age of consent;
6. That by reason of the aforesaid facts, I do hereby exercise my rights
as a free sovereign citizen of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, upheld by
various court decisions to revoke, rescind, cancel and to render null and
void, retroactively to the time of signing, based upon the constructive
fraud perpetrated upon me by the United States government, the "SOCIAL
SECURITY NUMBER" application (From SS-5), made before I became of legal
age, which caused a file bearing the identifying number [XXX-YY-ZZZZ] to be
established for myself; that this revocation and rescission is based upon
my rights in respect to constructive fraud as established in, but not
limited to the cases of Tyler v. Secretary of State, 184 A.2d 101 (1962),
and also El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Kysar Insurance Co., 605 Pacific 2d.
240 (1979) which stated: "Constructive fraud as well as actual fraud may
be the basis of cancellation of an instrument."
7. That I do hereby place the Social Security Administration on notice
that it is my sincerest desire that all files maintained by the Social
Security Administration which are associated with me or reflecting my
alleged earnings history be purged;
8. That all social security account records created by the Social
Security Administration are the property of the Social Security
Administration and not the property of any person that might be
described by such records;
9. That due to fact #8 above, I am not authorized to order the Social
Security Administration to purge any social security account records
that might pertain to myself;
10. That the decision that will be made pursuant to this affidavit,
whether or not to purge such file or account number, is a decision that
falls solely and fully within the domain and responsibility of the Social
Security Administration and that such decision is not my responsibility,
and that I am therefore not legally affected or bound by the consequences
of this decision;
11. That all social security cards issued by the Social Security
Administration are property of the Social Security Administration, as
claimed in writing on social security cards, and that social security
cards are not the property of the persons to whom they are issued;
12. That social security numbers are more properly called social security
account numbers as their proper purpose is to identify accounts maintained
by the Social Security Administration;
13. That social security account numbers are intangible abstract entities
that cannot be possessed by, adhered or bound to any person in any real,
tangible or physical manner.
14. That in light of these aforesaid facts, and revocation contained within
fact #6 above, I do not, in the truest sense, possess or have a social
security account, and I likewise do not possess or have a social security
account number.
15. In order to protect my Right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of
Happiness secured by the United States Constitution and the Constitution
of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, it may from time to time become
necessary to amend this affidavit. Wherefore, I do hereby declare that
right herein.
As of this writing, if I were to redo this affidavit, I would insert one
additional clarifying fact, basically that legally, I never had a
social security number. While this fact is evident in #6 above,
(rendering the original issuance of the number null and void),
it would not have hurt to restate it. Things like that can never be stated
in terms that are overly clear, especially in an affidavit.
Stating that I never had an SSN confuses some people, but we need to be clear
that I am not trying to rewrite history. It's just that there is a difference
between legal facts and historic facts. Historically speaking,
I did apply for and use something resembling an SSN, but because the
application for the number was not legal for the reasons stated
above, then the SSA's response to that application was not legal
either, ergo, I never had a social security number.
This legal phenomenon does occur regularly. Laws that are deemed
unconstitutional are rendered null & void retroactively to the
moment of enactment, and any violators of such a law are deemed to have
never violated that law, no matter how flagrantly they might have acted
in the face of it. Contracts rendered illegal are retroactively
non-binding, and deemed to have never existed. Annulled marriages,
as a legal matter, never took place.
In this vein, it follows that legally, I never had a social security
number, ever.
August 19, 1999
All information presented here is done so under the protection of the First, Fourth, Ninth, and Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and article I section 2 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Furthermore, as established in the famous trial of William Penn in August 1670, and contrary to the unlawful instructions given by most American judges, in addition to judging the facts of a case, juries also have the right and duty to pass judgement on the law (meaning they may acquit a violator of the law if they believe the law in question is unconstitutional, immoral, just plain stupid, or if the penalty is deemed too harsh). Juries are also lawfully free to vote according to their conscience, above all other considerations. |