Application for Passport

Cornelius J. McIver
[my address]

Attn: Mr. J. Britt
United States Department of State
[address]

October 2, 2000

Mr. Britt,

As per our conversation late last week, please find enclosed the following documents relating to my application for a passport:

  • High School ID card, 1980-81
  • High School Diploma, 1982
  • PADI (SCUBA) Certification Card
  • Columbia Gas (utility) bill, 1998
  • Internet service receipt, 1998
  • PA Certificate of Title for vehile, 1998.

I trust these documents will be sufficient to satisfy the qustion of my identity.

Please note these documents haev been send by USPS Registered mail to ensure their safe delivery. I would very much appreciate your returning these documents, along with my birth certificate, in the same fashion.

Thank you for your attention. Sincerely,

[signed]

Cornelius J. McIver

I sent this letter registered in an envelope that would sufficiently protect the docments that were sent along with it. I didn't fully expect the documents to be returned registered, but asking they be sent that way would still demonstrate the value I placed on them, and thereby further substantiate my identity.

As it turned out, around October 20th, 2000, I received the passport in the mail along with my birth certificate and all the above documents. Not surprisingly, the passport is not MY passport, but clearly states within it that it is the property of the US Government. That's good enough for me.

This Web Page: http://www.cjmciver.org/free/passport4.shtml

All information presented here is done so under the protection of the First, Fourth, Ninth, and Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and article I section 2 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Furthermore, as established in the famous trial of William Penn in August 1670, and contrary to the unlawful instructions given by most American judges, in addition to judging the facts of a case, juries also have the right and duty to pass judgement on the law (meaning they may acquit a violator of the law if they believe the law in question is unconstitutional, immoral, just plain stupid, or if the penalty is deemed too harsh). Juries are also lawfully free to vote according to their conscience, above all other considerations.